Specific psycho-pedagogical attention

Why do we psychopedagogues so amicably appropriate so many different disciplinary theories from other sciences? Is it a way of doing psychopedagogy? Is being a psychopedagogue a bit of everyone? Could it be that we have learned to be, without being? It worries me that to be a psychopedagogue I have to be a bit of a psychologist, a bit of a neurologist, a bit of a kinesiologist, a bit of a speech therapist, a bit of a special and common teacher, a bit of a psychoanalyst, a bit....I choose to be a psychopedagogue in order to approach the multiple problems of the subjects, with my own object and method. Knowing that from my discipline (psychopedagogy), I will interpret, diagnose, orient, accompany, treat and more... There is no other option than to decide. There is no other option but to decide: am I still a "disciplinary patchwork" or a psychopedagogue who does psychopedagogy?