Real Precautionary Measures in Peru

The present work studies the real precautionary measures regulated in the criminal procedural code of Peru, some reflections referred to the lack of systematic regulation of the real precautionary measures in the mentioned code, since they are regulated in a dispersed way in the criminal procedural code (Legislative Decree N. 957), Legislative Decree N. 635, Law 9024, Decree Law 1190, Law N. 27379, Law N. 30077, Legislative Decree N. 988, the Legislative Decree N. 1190, the criminal code, as is the case of numeral 2) of article 203 of the criminal procedural code that refers to the presuppositions of the search for evidence and restriction of rights, which in the absence of regulation of the article 203 of the criminal procedural code that refers to the presuppositions of the search for evidence and restriction of rights, the criminal code. 1190, the criminal code, as is for example the case of numeral 2) of article 203 of the criminal procedural code that refers to the assumptions of the search for evidence and restriction of rights, which in the absence of regulation of an autonomous procedure to request real precautionary measures in the criminal procedural code has led the Plenary Chamber of the Supreme Court of the Republic to have to consider them as rules of procedure to decree real precautionary measures, as it is read in the Plenary Agreement No. 7-2011/CJ-116, "precautionary measures". 7-2011/CJ-116.