COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO IMPLANT TECHNIQUES

Immediate implantation (II) is performed before the alveolus has completely healed, in order to take advantage of the hemodynamic and healing changes brought about by avulsion to promote osseointegration. This is in contrast to delayed implantation (RI), which is performed once the bone tissue has fully consolidated. It is difficult to find a consensus in the current literature as to the superiority of one technique over the other, but after analysis of our results, we can conclude that II is preferable to IR, as it reduces soft tissue manipulation,limit hard tissue resorption and fill holes more rapidly after implant loading than in the delayed technique, of course if papillae preservation has been achieved during tooth extraction, hence periodontal extraction.