Arbitration and Mediation under OHADA

Faced with the distrust of litigants before the Courts and Tribunals, the litigants before these jurisdictions, opt for arbitration and mediation resulting from OHADA. Investors prefer to avoid the causes presiding over the distrust of the traditional Justice of the State, a regal power after all. Fortunately, the OHADA legislator, in his unceasing quest for legal and judicial security, has marvelously thought of conventional justice organized by the parties to business or commercial litigation. Without doubt, it is not an easy task to praise conventional justice alongside traditional and classical justice organized by the State. However, the economic powers, in other words the natural and legal persons traders, relish the contractual freedom advocated by OHADA and find several advantages in the said conventional Justice.This book proposes, in an empirical and pedagogical approach, to explain arbitration and mediation resulting from OHADA and to emphasize the effects and opportunities offered by the arbitrator and the mediator thanks to a comparative table.